Halloween party ideas 2015



 UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

 






JUDICIARY OF TANZANIA


CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL OFFICERS
OF TANZANIA


Under legal profession it also provide under Section 66 (2) (c) of the Judiciary Administration Act, No. 4 of  2011.The purpose of this Code is to provide guidelines for and prescribe ethical conduct for all judicial officers in Tanzania.
The following are the code of conducts of legal profession in Tanzania including
.
JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE
Statement
An independent Judiciary is indispensable to impartial justice under the law. A judicial officer must, therefore, uphold and exemplify judicial independence in both its individual and institutional aspects to reinforce public confidence in the Judiciary.
Rules
1.      (1)  A judicial officer must exercise his or her judicial functions independently and free of extraneous influence.
(2)  A judicial officer must firmly reject any attempt to influence his or her decisions in any matter before the court outside the proper process of the court.
(3) A judicial officer must encourage and uphold all such arrangements and safeguards to maintain and enhance the institutional and operational independence of the Judiciary.


INTEGRITY

Legal practiona must conduct themselves with integrity so as to sustain and enhance public confidence in the Judiciary. To that end, every a judicial officer should demonstrate soundness of moral character through consistency of action, values, honesty and trustfulness.
Rules
2.      (1) A judicial officer must ensure that his or her conduct is above reproach, in his or her public or private life and in the view of the reasonable observer.
(2)   A judicial officer’s behaviour and conduct must reaffirm the public's faith in the integrity of the Judiciary.
(3)   A judicial officer, in addition to observing these standards personally, must promote collegiality, encourage and support their observance by his or her judicial colleagues.
(4)   A judicial officer or member of his or her family must not accept a gift, bequest, favour or loan from any person for purposes of a bribe or corrupt practice or which is calculated to influence the officer in the execution of his or her duties:
Provided that a gift, award, loan or other benefit which cannot reasonably be
perceived as a bribe or corrupt practice or one accompanied by intention to influence
the judicial officer in the performance of his duties shall be excluded.
(5)   A judicial officer shall not be regarded  to have solicited or received a bribe if a gift, an award or a benefit comes from immediate family members or from public leaders elsewhere;
(6)   For the avoidance of doubt and subject to the law and to any legal requirements of public disclosure, a judicial officer may receive a token gift, award or benefit as appropriate to the occasion on which it is made provided that such gift, award or benefit might not reasonably be perceived as intended to influence the judicial officer in the performance of judicial duties or otherwise give rise to an appearance of partiality.
(7)    A judicial officer must not give legal or investment advice, except to members of his or her immediate family and for no fee.
(8)   A judicial officer must not issue any statement, criticism or argument against the Judiciary.
PROPRIETY
Statement
A judicial officer must avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all his or her public and private activities.

Rules
3.      (1) A judicial officer shall devote his or her professional activity to judicial duties which include not only performance of judicial functions and responsibilities in court and the making of decisions, but other tasks relevant to the judicial office or the court’s operation.
(2)   A judicial officer shall not release or say anything regarding a decision of the court before it is published. A judicial officer should not discuss details of individual cases outside court.
(3)   A judicial officer should not release information about the judicial officer’s discussions with colleague when making their decisions.
(4)   A judicial officer being a subject of constant public scrutiny must accept personal restrictions that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinary citizen and should do so freely and willingly. In particular, a judicial officer shall conduct himself or herself in a way that is consistent with the dignity of the judicial office.
(5)   A judicial officer shall not practise law while holding a judicial office.
(6)   A judicial officer may form or join associations of judicial officers or participate in other organisations representing the interest of the judicial officer concerned.
(7)   A judicial officer may, subject to the proper performance of judicial duties:
(a)    write, lecture, teach and participate in activities concerning the law, the legal system, the administration of justice or related matters;
(b)   appear at a public hearing before an official body concerned with matters relating to the law, the legal system, the administration of justice or related matters;
(c)    serve as a member of an official body, or other government commission, committee or advisory body, if such membership is not inconsistent with the perceived impartiality and political neutrality of a judicial officer; or
(d)   engage in other activities if such activities do not detract from the dignity of the judicial office or otherwise interfere with the performance of judicial duties.

COMPETENCE AND DILIGENCE
Statement
A judicial officer must engage in training and preparation so as to be competent in performing his or her duties. He or she must be diligent in the performance of their judicial duties.
Rules
4.         (1) A judicial officer shall take reasonable steps to maintain and enhance his knowledge, skills and personal qualities necessary for the proper performance of judicial duties.
(2)   A judicial officer shall keep himself or herself informed about relevant developments of the law, amendments and new precedents.
(3)   A judicial officer shall perform all judicial duties, including the delivery of reserved decisions, efficiently, fairly and with reasonable promptness.
(4)   A judicial officer should conduct court hearings at scheduled and published times and should observe punctuality.
(5)   A judicial officer should give decisions within the prescribed or reasonable time with full reasons identifying the relevant law(s) and the evidence relied upon.
(6)   A judicial officer shall maintain order and decorum in all proceedings before the court and be patient, dignified and courteous in relation to litigants, assessors, witnesses, lawyers and others with whom the judicial officer deals in an official capacity. The judicial officer shall require similar conduct from legal representatives, court staff and others subject to his or her influence, direction or control. 
(7)   A judicial officer shall not engage in conduct incompatible with the diligent discharge of judicial duties.

EQUALITY
Statement
A judicial officer should ensure that every one is treated with respect and courtesy and with equality according to the law.
Rules
5.      (1) A judicial officer should ensure that every proceeding is conducted fairly.
(2)   A judicial officer must strive to be aware of and understand differences arising from gender, race, religion, culture, ethnic background, disability or health condition and must not discriminate on these or any other ground.
(3)   A judicial officer must not be a member of any organization that practises any form of discrimination that contravenes the law, or that brings disrepute to the Judiciary.
(4)   A judicial officer must, in the course of proceedings before him or her, disassociate himself or herself from and disapprove of any clearly irrelevant comments or conduct by court staff, legal practitioners or anyone subject to the judicial officer’s direction which are sexist, racist or otherwise demonstrate discrimination on grounds prohibited by law, or frowned upon in a judicial atmosphere.

IMPARTIALITY
Statement
Impartiality in both the decision and the decision making process is essential to the proper discharge of judicial duties.

Rules
A.     General :-
6.      (1) A judicial officer must ensure that his or her conduct, both in and out of court, maintains and enhances confidence in the impartiality of the Judiciary.
(2)   A judicial officer must conduct his or her personal and private affairs in such a manner as to minimise the occasions on which it will be necessary to be disqualified or to recuse himself or herself from hearing cases.
B.     Civic and Charitable Activity:-
(1) A judicial officer is free to participate in civic and charitable activities subject to the following considerations:
(a)     must avoid any activity or association that could reflect adversely on his or her impartiality or interfere with the performance of judicial duties;
(b)   must not solicit funds or lend prestige of judicial office to such solicitations except for appropriate purposes; and
(c)     must not be involved in causes or organizations that are to his or her knowledge likely to be engaged in litigation.
(2)   A judicial officer may, subject to the provisions of this Code, engage in writing and participate in activities concerning the law, the legal system, the administration of justice and related matters.
(3)    A judicial officer may, subject to the provisions of this Code,  speak publicly on non-legal subjects and engage in historical, educational, cultural, sporting or like recreational activities, if such activities do not detract from the dignity of the judicial office or otherwise interfere with the performance of judicial duties.
(4)   A judicial officer must not be a member of groups or organizations or participate in public discussions which, in the mind of a reasonable, fair minded and informed person, would undermine confidence in the judicial officer’s impartiality with respect to issues that could come before the courts.
C.     Political Activity:-
(1)   A judicial officer must cease all partisan political activities upon appointment and refrain from conduct that, in the mind of a reasonable, fair minded and informed person, could give rise to the appearance that the judicial officer is engaged in political activity.
(2)   A judicial officer must refrain from:
(a)    membership in political parties and political fund raising;
(b)   attendance at political gatherings and political fund raising events;
(c)    contributing to political parties or campaigns;
(d)   taking part publicly in controversial political discussions except in respect of matters directly affecting the operation of the courts, the independence of the Judiciary or fundamental aspects of the administration of justice; or
(e)    signing petitions to influence a political decision.
(3)    Although members of a judicial officer’s family have every right to be politically active, a judicial officer must recognize that such activities of immediate family members may, even if erroneously, affect the public perception of a judicial officer’s impartiality. A judicial officer may not sit in any case before the court in which there could reasonably be such a perception.

D.    Conflict of Interest
(1)   A judicial officer must disqualify himself or herself in any case in which  that judicial officer:
(a)    believes he or she will be unable to adjudicate impartially;
(b)   believes that a reasonable, fair minded and informed person, would have a reasonable suspicion of conflict between a judicial officer’s personal interest or that of a judicial officer’s immediate family and  his or her judicial functions;
(c)    has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or personal knowledge or facts;
(d)   served as a lawyer in a matter in controversy or a lawyer with whom he previously practised law served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter or the judicial officer or such lawyer has been a material witness in the matter;
(2)   Disqualification is not appropriate if:
(a) the matter giving rise to the perception of a possibility of conflict is trifling or would
not support a plausible argument in favour of disqualification; or
(b) no other judicial officer can deal with the case or because of urgent circumstances, failure to act could lead to a miscarriage of justice;
(c) upon disclosure of the ground(s) of intended recusal by the judicial  officer,  the parties agree that the judicial officer may participate in the proceedings. The consent by the parties or their representatives shall be recorded and shall form part of the record of proceedings.

E.     Judicial Demeanour
A judicial officer must, while acting decisively, maintain firm control of the process and ensure expedition and treat everyone before the court with appropriate courtesy.
ENFORCEMENT
Act. No. 4 of 2011
7.      The Code shall be enforced by the Judicial Service Commission and the Committees established under the Judiciary Administration Act. 


DEFINITIONS
8.      In this Code, unless the context requires otherwise-
Act No. 4 of 2011.
“Code” means the Code of Judicial Conduct prescribed under section 66 (2) (c) of the Judiciary Administration Act;

“immediate family member” shall include a spouse, child, grandchild, parent, grand parent, great grandparent, sibling, uncle, aunt, niece, nephew, cousin , in laws or any person living in the same household as a family member of the judicial officer;
Act No. 4 of 2011.
“judicial officer”  has the meaning ascribed to it under section 3 of the Judiciary Administration Act.




Next
Newer Post
Previous
This is the last post.

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.